About Us  |   Contact Us  |   Register  | Login  |   

Follow HedgeWorld on Twitter HedgeWorld on LinkedIn






HEDGEWORLD NEWS
Search the News
Advanced News Search
HedgeWorld News by Region
United States / Americas
Europe
Asia / Australia
International
HedgeWorld News Sections
Managed Futures & Derivatives
Daily News
Regulatory/Legal
Strategies/Analysis
Technology
Opinion
People
Indexes
Other News Features
Most Popular
LexisNexis Headlines
Reuters Headlines
The HedgeWorld Blog
Alternative Advantage Daily Newsletter
RSS Service
Sign Up For Email News Alerts
Reprints



Former UBS bankers denied new trial in muni bid-rigging case
05/16/2014 Email this story  |  Printable Version

By Andrew Longstreth

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A federal U.S. judge on Thursday denied a request for a new trial made by three former UBS AG bankers who were convicted of rigging bids to invest municipal bond proceeds.

A jury in August 2012 convicted Gary Heinz, Peter Ghavami and Michael Welty, of defrauding municipal bond issuers, the U.S. Department of Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service. Ghavami was also convicted of wire fraud.

Last July, Ghavami, who left UBS in 2007 as global head of commodities, was sentenced to 18 months in prison. Heinz, a former bank vice president, received 27 months and Welty, a former vice president, received 16 months.

In seeking a new trial, a lawyer for Welty argued that the U.S. government failed to turn over evidence that could have changed the outcome of the case. Heinz and Ghavami joined the motion.

In her opinion, U.S. District Judge Kimba Wood of Manhattan disagreed. She found that the government had turned over to the defense the equivalent of 19.5 million records prior to the trial.

After the trial, the government discovered that due to the fault of a vendor, it had not reviewed an additional 400,000 documents, according to Wood. After handing those documents over to the defendants, Welty claimed that an email could have helped his case.

But Wood wrote that "even if it had been disclosed before trial, there is no reason to believe that it would have had any impact on the verdict."

Wood also denied a request by Welty and Heinz to be released from prison pending their appeal.

Charles Stillman, an attorney for Ghavami, declined to comment.

Lawyers for Welty and Heinz did not immediately return messages seeking comment.

The case is U.S. v. Ghavami et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 10-cr-01217.


Email This Story to a Friend   |   Display Printable Version of This Story

Story Copyright © 1999-2014 Reuters HedgeWorld All rights reserved.

HedgeWorld News is sponsored by:






Lipper    Privacy   User Policy  Legal Disclosure Copyright/DMCA  Site Map    FAQ    Glossary  Thomson Reuters for Hedge Funds
All rights reserved. Users may download and print extracts of content from this website for their own personal and non-commercial use only. Republication or redistribution of HedgeWorld content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Thomson Reuters. HedgeWorld is a registered trademark of Thomson Reuters.